Document what needs correction
We compare the public account with approved factual material and identify the exact statement, source and requested change. Counsel supplies or approves descriptions of case status and outcomes.
Content corrections and removal requests
Address the source with an appropriate request
Review outdated case coverage, incorrect identities and other damaging sources. We prepare supported requests where an appropriate publisher or platform pathway exists.
Send an inquiryThe online first impression
A name. A firm. A first impression.
News & public coverageWhat is shaping the conversation?
Review the sources people encounter.
Assess the concern Professional informationMake current experience easier to find.
Connect credentials, profiles, and original content.
Build credibility Search & AI visibilityUnderstand what changes over time.
Track the searches that matter to the engagement.
Illustrative assessment topics, not live search results.
Choose the right pathway
A request might seek a factual correction, update or eligible removal. We record the basis, supporting information, submission and response. Publishers and platforms decide whether to act; court record and legal remedy questions stay with counsel.
Coordinate specialist concerns
Wikipedia, social profiles and autocomplete concerns can be assessed within the agreed scope. Any request or contribution must follow the relevant platform rules. We do not promise editorial control or deletion.
- What you receive
- A source review and recommended plan; an agreed campaign can add content, profiles, appropriate requests, and progress reporting.
- What we need to begin
- Names, a few public links, the decisions being affected, and an approval contact.
- How fees are set
- Your proposal identifies included work, fees, timing, and responsibilities before you commit.
Included work
What the service
can cover.
- An agreed baseline, priorities and named approval contacts
- A written scope of actions, fees, dependencies and reporting
- Approved content or requests included in the engagement
- A record of completed work, observations and unresolved decisions
When it fits
For a firm or attorney
Coordinate professional reputation work with a designated reviewer.
For a represented client
Keep the public information plan aligned with counsel’s direction.
Before you decide
One clear record of decisions and progress
The engagement lead records approval status, actions, dates and the next decision. Search engines, publishers and AI systems control their own outputs. We do not promise removal, rankings or a particular answer.
How we coordinate the workWhat do you need to begin?
A brief description, relevant public links and the name of the contact coordinating the inquiry. Agree the handling of further information before sending sensitive material.
Who approves publication?
The designated reviewer approves sensitive wording and destinations before publication. Recipients and any client participation are agreed at the outset.
Related resources
Start a conversation
Let’s talk about what needs to change.
Tell us what people are finding, who it affects, and what matters most. We’ll help identify a useful place to begin.